Stealthfox vs Mimic: Which Browser Works Best for You?
When managing multiple ad accounts in 2025, using a standard browser just doesn’t cut it anymore. You need tools that can isolate fingerprints, handle proxies, and spoof digital identities. Two of the most popular solutions under the Multilogin platform are Stealthfox and Mimic.
But which one should you choose?
In this guide, we’ll break down the key differences between Stealthfox and Mimic, helping you decide which browser is best for your use case.
What Are Stealthfox and Mimic?
Both are anti-detect browser engines offered by Multilogin. Each creates isolated browser profiles to prevent fingerprint tracking across multiple accounts.
Feature | Mimic | Stealthfox |
---|---|---|
Engine | Chromium (like Google Chrome) | Firefox-based |
Performance | Faster, modern UI | Stable, legacy support |
Fingerprint Control | Advanced (WebGL, Canvas, Audio) | More basic spoofing |
Use Case | Ads, automation, browser scraping | Lightweight ad management, VA teams |
Device Emulation | More realistic (mobile support) | Desktop-focused |
Mimic Browser: When to Use It
Mimic is ideal if:
- You want to simulate real Chrome-like behavior
- You run campaigns on platforms like TikTok Ads, Google Ads
- You need deep fingerprint spoofing (canvas, audio, WebGL)
- You’re managing accounts that require maximum trust and realism
Pros:
- Advanced spoofing of over 30 fingerprint parameters
- Supports WebRTC/IP leak protection
- Easier automation compatibility (e.g., Selenium/Playwright)
- More stable with complex JavaScript environments
Cons:
- Slightly heavier on resources
- May not run well on low-spec VPS
Stealthfox Browser: When to Use It
Stealthfox is great if:
- You want a lighter alternative to Chrome-based engines
- You work with older machines or remote VPS setups
- Your focus is on Facebook Ads or small-scale profile farming
- You’re working with a VA team and need easier access sharing
Pros:
- Lower CPU/RAM usage
- Less likely to crash on unstable systems
- Simpler for beginner users
- Quick to launch and manage multiple profiles
Cons:
- Less fingerprint realism
- May struggle with JS-heavy platforms
Use Case Comparison
Use Case | Recommended Browser |
---|---|
Facebook Ads with VA | Stealthfox |
TikTok Ads with advanced AI checks | Mimic |
Multi-account browser automation | Mimic |
Working from a low-end VPS | Stealthfox |
Managing 100+ profiles | Stealthfox |
Building long-trust accounts | Mimic |
Can You Use Both?
Absolutely. The beauty of Multilogin is that it lets you run both browsers side-by-side.
You can assign:
- Mimic profiles for accounts needing trust, realism, and growth
- Stealthfox profiles for temporary use, warmups, or client access
This gives you flexibility + control depending on the account lifecycle.
Bonus Tip: Don’t Forget the Proxy
Regardless of browser engine:
- Always use 1 clean proxy per profile (mobile/residential preferred)
- Match proxy geolocation with fingerprint timezone
- Avoid datacenter proxies—they trigger bans easily
Need help setting up your first profiles with mobile proxies?
Check this step-by-step mobile proxy guide (chèn nếu có)
Pricing & Discount Info
Both browsers come with the same Multilogin subscription.
🎯 You can get 50% OFF your first plan using this exclusive promo code:
ADBNEW50
🔗 Click here to activateConclusion
Choose Mimic if you’re scaling sensitive ad accounts or need better realism.
Go with Stealthfox if you prefer lightweight performance or need team-ready setups.And if you’re unsure, try both. Multilogin gives you full access to both engines—so you’re never locked into one choice.